Re: 2.6.15-mm2: alpha broken

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 01:12:24PM -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 10:19:30AM -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> > > On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Paul Jackson wrote:
> > >
> > > > Adrian wrote:
> > > > > This is the amout of testing I can afford.
> > > >
> > > > It sounds to me like you are saying that a minute of your time is
> > > > more valuable than a minute of each of several other peoples time.
> > > >
> > > > The only two people I gladly accept that argument from are Linus
> > > > and Andrew.
> > > >
> > > > For the rest of us, it is important to minimize the total workload
> > > > of all us combined, not to optimize our individual output.
> > > >
> > > > What you don't test, several others of us get to test.  Only its often
> > > > more work, for -each- of us, as we each have to figure out which of
> > > > 1000 patches caused the breakage.
> > >
> > > I don't find building cross-toolchains quite as easy as Al does,
> > > so I download and build with these (on i386):
> > >   http://developer.osdl.org/dev/plm/cross_compile/
> > > as Andrew has also mentioned in the past.
> > >
> > > Or one can submit kernel patches for builds to an OSDL
> > > build machine which does 8 or 9 $ARCH builds.
> >
> > This leaves 15 or 16 other architectures for my puny 1,8 GHz CPU.
> >
> > And does OSDL fix other people's compile breakages in the latest -mm
> > before I submit my patches, or am I required to play QA for every
> > single architecture before I can submit one single patch touching
> > architecture-independend files?
> 
> -ETOOMUCHSARCASM
> (from someone who also uses sarcasm often)
> 
> But seriously, I don't think anyone suggested anything quite
> as extreme as your question implies.

Where's the sarcasm?

Looking at [1], the change to include/linux/kernel.h I'm so heavily 
criticized for in this thread broke the compilation of 2.6.16-mm2 
on 3 or 4 out of our 24 architectures.

Which less extreme approach would for sure have prevented this?

> ~Randy

cu
Adrian

[1] http://l4x.org/k/

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux