Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)

On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 01:00 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Here are the relevant lines of arch/x86_64/kernel/vmlinux.lds:
> > 
> >     382 OUTPUT_FORMAT("elf64-x86-64", "elf64-x86-64", "elf64-x86-64")
> >     383 OUTPUT_ARCH(1:x86-64)
> >     384 ENTRY(phys_startup_64)
> > 
> > Any ideas?  Another toolchain quirk?
> 
> The original is 
> 
> OUTPUT_ARCH(i386:x86-64)
> 
> It replaced the i386 with 1, which obviously doesn't work.
> 
> Try (full patch again) 

Do you expect these fixes to go into 2.6.16?

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: kernel.org is down (changeset link broken)
• Next by Date: Re: kernel.org is down (changeset link broken)
• Previous by thread: Is kgdb for kernel 2.6.13 compatible with 2.6.14.5
• Next by thread: Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]