Re: [PATCH] Re: 2G memory split

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Lennart Sorensen wrote:

On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 09:30:58AM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
Bernd Eckenfels wrote:

Here are the patches I use for the splitting. They work well. The methods employed in Red Hat ES are far better and I am surprised no one has simply integrated those patches into the kernel which are 4GB / 4GB kernel/user.
I was under the impression the 4G/4G split had some non negligable
performance penalties compared to the other options.
It does, but from my testing, I/O performance and app performance seems 
negligible. I run the highest performing app/driver
on Linux for disk and network I/O loading and ES3 and ES4 are just as 
performant with 4:4 as FC2, FC3, and FC4 with
3:1.

I am now able to capture 4 x gigabit segments with 3:1 at sustained stream to disk rates of 497 MB/S and 1 x 10Gbe at 517 MB/S stream to disk. I see no appreciable performance differences 3:1 vs. 4:4. Modern Xeon processors have gotten a lot better dealing with TLB invalidation. I suppose applications that remap memory all over the place or that do tons of swapping would see some penalty, and I do see some performance degredation when user space apps start swapping, but it's difficult to quantify how much is related to disk I/O latency vs. TLB overhear. Most TLB flushes will cost you 150 clocks over time as the TLB reloads
itself.

Jeff

Len Sorensen

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux