Re: [PATCH 0/3] updated *at function patch

I renumbered the syscalls due to the queued-up sys_migrate_pages.

We don't have changelogs for these patches.  Apart from the usual
what-it-does and how-it-does it I'd really like to be reminded of the
"why".  Adding a bunch of stuff to the core kernel codepaths needs to have
a good reason and I've forgotten your rationale.

We'll need Signed-off_by:'s for all these patches.

In future, please avoid sending multiple patches under the same Subject:,
thanks.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 0/3] updated *at function patch
    • From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/3] updated *at function patch
    • From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH, RFC] RCU : OOM avoidance and lower latency
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH, RFC] RCU : OOM avoidance and lower latency
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 0/3] updated *at function patch
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/3] updated *at function patch
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]