Re: [patch] latency tracer, 2.6.15-rc7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 09:22 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Lee Revell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I'm not sure how much work it would be to break out 
> > CONFIG_LATENCY_TRACE as a separate patch.
> could you check out the 2.6.15-rc7 version of the latency tracer i 
> uploaded to:
> could test it by e.g. trying to reproduce the same VM latency as in the 
> -rt tree. [the two zlib patches are needed if you are using 4K stacks, 
> mcount increases stack footprint.]


Would you mind submitting this for 2.6.16?  We already have one case
where it would have caught a regression in time for 2.6.15, so IMHO this
would be a great addition to "Kernel hacking".

I have had absolutely no problems running this with 2.6.15-rc7, it works
perfectly, as it has in the -rt tree for ages.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux