On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 05:11:42PM +0000, David Vrabel wrote:
> platform_get_irq*() cannot return 0 on error as 0 is a valid IRQ on some
> platforms, return NO_IRQ (-1) instead.
This change would require an audit of the users of these functions.
Could you check whether this is going to cause them any problems?
> Index: linux-2.6-working/drivers/base/platform.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-working.orig/drivers/base/platform.c 2006-01-05 16:49:23.000000000 +0000
> +++ linux-2.6-working/drivers/base/platform.c 2006-01-05 17:10:18.000000000 +0000
> @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@
> {
> struct resource *r = platform_get_resource(dev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, num);
>
> - return r ? r->start : 0;
> + return r ? r->start : NO_IRQ;
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@
> {
> struct resource *r = platform_get_resource_byname(dev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, name);
>
> - return r ? r->start : 0;
> + return r ? r->start : NO_IRQ;
> }
>
> /**
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
