Re: [PATCH 01/14] page-replace-single-batch-insert.patch

On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 09:44:07AM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Dec 2005, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> 
> > Unification of active and inactive per cpu page lists is a requirement 
> > for CLOCK-Pro, right?
> 
> You can approximate the functionality through use of scan
> rates.  Not quite as accurate as a unified clock, though.

Rik, I dont understand what you mean.

My point is that the page-replacement-policy abstraction patches affect
the original behaviour, and they shouldnt. See the post from Peter about
abstracting the per-cpu lists.

We're talking about different things.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] vm: page-replace and clockpro
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 01/14] page-replace-single-batch-insert.patch
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 01/14] page-replace-single-batch-insert.patch
    • From: Marcelo Tosatti <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 01/14] page-replace-single-batch-insert.patch
    • From: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 6/9] clockpro-clockpro.patch
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 6/9] clockpro-clockpro.patch
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 01/14] page-replace-single-batch-insert.patch
• Next by thread: [PATCH 03/14] page-replace-remove-sc-from-refill.patch
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]