Dave Jones wrote:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 10:57:40PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: > Mark Lord wrote: > > > >Okay, I'm complaining: /proc/cpuinfo is no longer correct > >for my Pentium-M notebook, as ov 2.6.15-rc7. Now it reports > >a cpu speed of approx 800Mhz for a 2.0Mhz Pentium-M.> > 2.0GHz, not Mhz! (blush) > > Prior to -rc7, /proc/cpuinfo would scale according to the> current speedstep of the CPU. Now it seems stuck at the > lowest setting for some reason. Ok, if the scaling doesn't work any more, that's a bug rather than an intentional breakage. More details please? dmesg ? /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq contents? What were you using to do the scaling previously? (An app, or ondemand)
The actual speedstep component ("ondemand" cpufreq) is working just
fine, according to /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq. But /proc/cpuinfo
is no longer reflecting the current values -- stuck at 800Mhz
regardless of /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq showing other values.
Cheers
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- Prev by Date: Re: [POLL] SLAB : Are the 32 and 192 bytes caches really usefull on x86_64 machines ?
- Next by Date: Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- Index(es):
 |