Re: [2.6.15-rc7 patch] Reject SRAT tables that don't cover all memory

On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 02:39:02PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Below is a patch by Andi Kleen from kernel Bugzilla #5758 fixing a 
> post-2.6.14 regression.

WTF are you submitting my patches? Please don't do this - I am perfectly
capable to do this on my own when the time is ripe for them. For this
patch that's post 2.6.15 and after more testing.

-Andi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [2.6.15-rc7 patch] Reject SRAT tables that don't cover all memory
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Ho ho ho.. Linux 2.6.15-rc7
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • [2.6.15-rc7 patch] Reject SRAT tables that don't cover all memory
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: PCI DMA burst delay
• Next by Date: Re: X86_64 compile error (crash.c)
• Previous by thread: [2.6.15-rc7 patch] Reject SRAT tables that don't cover all memory
• Next by thread: Re: [2.6.15-rc7 patch] Reject SRAT tables that don't cover all memory
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]