[patch] latency tracer, 2.6.15-rc7

* Lee Revell <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm not sure how much work it would be to break out 
> CONFIG_LATENCY_TRACE as a separate patch.

could you check out the 2.6.15-rc7 version of the latency tracer i 
uploaded to:

	http://redhat.com/~mingo/latency-tracing-patches/

could test it by e.g. trying to reproduce the same VM latency as in the 
-rt tree. [the two zlib patches are needed if you are using 4K stacks, 
mcount increases stack footprint.]

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch] latency tracer, 2.6.15-rc7
    • From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>

• References:
  • 2.6.15-rc5: latency regression vs 2.6.14 in exit_mmap->free_pgtables
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.15-rc5: latency regression vs 2.6.14 in exit_mmap->free_pgtables
    • From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.15-rc5: latency regression vs 2.6.14 in exit_mmap->free_pgtables
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 6 of 20] ipath - driver debugging headers
• Next by Date: [PATCH] x86_64 write apic id fix
• Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.15-rc5: latency regression vs 2.6.14 in exit_mmap->free_pgtables
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] latency tracer, 2.6.15-rc7
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]