Re: [linux-pm] [patch] pm: fix runtime powermanagement's /sys interface

On 12/27/05, Pavel Machek <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>  static ssize_t state_show(struct device * dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char * buf)
>  {
> -       return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", dev->power.power_state.event);
> +       if (dev->power.power_state.event)
> +               return sprintf(buf, "suspend\n");
> +       else
> +               return sprintf(buf, "on\n");
>  }

Are you sure that having only 2 options (suspend/on) is enough at the
core level? I could envision having more levels, like "poweroff", etc?

--
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [linux-pm] [patch] pm: fix runtime powermanagement's /sys interface
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch] pm: fix runtime powermanagement's /sys interface
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [SCHED] Totally WRONG prority calculation with specific test-case (since 2.6.10-bk12)
• Next by Date: Re: recommended mail clients
• Previous by thread: [patch] pm: fix runtime powermanagement's /sys interface
• Next by thread: Re: [linux-pm] [patch] pm: fix runtime powermanagement's /sys interface
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]