On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 04:02:44PM +0000, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > What exactly changed in the recent USB stacks that is causing it to
> > > abort system suspend much more often ? I'm getting lots of user reports
> > > with 2.6.15-rc5 saying that they can't put their internal laptops to
> > > sleep, apparently because a driver doesn't have a suspend method
> > > (internal bluetooth in this case).
> > >
> > > It's never been mandatory so far for all drivers of all connected
> > > devices to have a suspend method... didn't we decide back then that
> > > disconneting those was the right way to go ?
> >
> > Yes it is, and I have a patch in my tree now that fixes this up and
> > keeps the suspend process working properly for usb drivers that do not
> > have a suspend function.
> >
> > Hm, I wonder if it should go in for 2.6.15?
>
> It would be nice to have some fixes in 2.6.15, so we are
> not swamped with bugreports. Its a regression after all.
It's already in 2.6.15-rc7.
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
