Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] RTC subsystem, class

Hi!

> > > +int rtc_set_alarm(struct class_device *class_dev, struct rtc_wkalrm*alrm)
> > 
> > Struct rtc_wake_alarm *alarm, those wovels are there for readability.
> 
>  I'm not the one who created this structure. It's defined
>  in linux/rtc.h since a long time. I can only change alrm
>  to alarm.

Sorry if you are not responsible... Yes, alarm would be better.

How does this relate to /proc/acpi/alarm, btw? Do they use same RTC
alarm?


							Pavel
-- 
Thanks, Sharp!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] RTC subsystem, class
    • From: Alessandro Zummo <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC][PATCH 1/6] RTC subsystem, class
    • From: Alessandro Zummo <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] RTC subsystem, class
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] RTC subsystem, class
    • From: Alessandro Zummo <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] i386 No Idle HZ aka dynticks 051221
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC][MMC] Buggy cards need to leave programming state
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] RTC subsystem, class
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] RTC subsystem, class
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]