Re: [PATCH] SLAB - have index_of bug at compile time.

Hi Steven,

On 12/26/05, Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote:
> Now, maybe NUMA and vmalloc might be a good reason to start a new
> allocation system along side of slab?

A better approach would probably be to introduce a vmem layer similar
to what Solaris has to solve I/O memory and vmalloc issue. What NUMA
issue are you referring to btw? I don't see any problem with the
current design (in fact, I stole it for my magazine allocator too).
It's just that the current implementation is bit hard to understand.

                         Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] SLAB - have index_of bug at compile time.
    • From: Manfred Spraul <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH] SLAB - have index_of bug at compile time.
    • From: Manfred Spraul <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] SLAB - have index_of bug at compile time.
    • From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: recommended mail clients
• Next by Date: Re: recommended mail clients [was] [PATCH] ati-agp suspend/resume support (try 2)
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] SLAB - have index_of bug at compile time.
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] SLAB - have index_of bug at compile time.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]