-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Kristian Slavov <[email protected]>
I reported a problem and gave hints to the solution, but nobody seemed
to react. So I prepared a patch against 2.6.14.4.
Tested on 2.6.14.4 with "ip monitor addr" and with the program
attached, while adding and removing IPv6 address. Both programs didn't
receive any messages. Tested 2.6.14.4 + this patch, and both programs
received add and remove messages.
Signed-off-by: Kristian Slavov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jamal Hadi salim <[email protected]>
ACKed-by: Patrick McHardy <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
include/linux/rtnetlink.h | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
--- linux-2.6.14.4.orig/include/linux/rtnetlink.h
+++ linux-2.6.14.4/include/linux/rtnetlink.h
@@ -866,6 +866,7 @@ enum rtnetlink_groups {
#define RTNLGRP_IPV4_MROUTE RTNLGRP_IPV4_MROUTE
RTNLGRP_IPV4_ROUTE,
#define RTNLGRP_IPV4_ROUTE RTNLGRP_IPV4_ROUTE
+ RTNLGRP_NOP1,
RTNLGRP_IPV6_IFADDR,
#define RTNLGRP_IPV6_IFADDR RTNLGRP_IPV6_IFADDR
RTNLGRP_IPV6_MROUTE,
@@ -876,8 +877,11 @@ enum rtnetlink_groups {
#define RTNLGRP_IPV6_IFINFO RTNLGRP_IPV6_IFINFO
RTNLGRP_DECnet_IFADDR,
#define RTNLGRP_DECnet_IFADDR RTNLGRP_DECnet_IFADDR
+ RTNLGRP_NOP2,
RTNLGRP_DECnet_ROUTE,
#define RTNLGRP_DECnet_ROUTE RTNLGRP_DECnet_ROUTE
+ RTNLGRP_NOP3,
+ RTNLGRP_NOP4,
RTNLGRP_IPV6_PREFIX,
#define RTNLGRP_IPV6_PREFIX RTNLGRP_IPV6_PREFIX
__RTNLGRP_MAX
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
