>>>Developer replies that the source code will be provided
>>>only to paying customers:
>>
>>
>> Not really. Developer does make the bizarre statement that "paid
>> customers" are entitled to source code, but doesn't say nobody else is.
>> And Developer says at the same time he will make source code available
to
>> the person who requested it. The problem is that he doesn't actually
do
>> it, and is never heard from again.
>
>Call me crazy but if one requests a copy of the source only to never
>hear from the developer, is that not a direct violation of the GPL? To
>me this sounds like the developer is walking a pretty fine line.
I'll just call you crazy for implying that someone said otherwise.
If you look above, you'll see a statement that the developer said he would
supply source code only to paying customers, and then a contradiction that
says the developer did not say that. It then adds an extra fact to
explain what the developer _really_ did to create the violation.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
