On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 10:29 -0600, K.R. Foley wrote:
>
> OK. The BUG still exists (output below) but it does boot now with the
> above patch applied (THANKS Steven!), which would seem to imply the two
> weren't related. ARGH! :)
>
> Dec 23 10:16:27 porky kernel: Event source lapic installed with caps set: 06
> Dec 23 10:16:27 porky kernel: BUG: swapper:0 task might have lost a
> preemption check!
> Dec 23 10:16:27 porky kernel: Brought up 2 CPUs
> Dec 23 10:16:27 porky kernel: checking if image is initramfs... it is
> Dec 23 10:16:27 porky kernel: [<c010424e>] dump_stack+0x1e/0x20 (20)
> Dec 23 10:16:27 porky kernel: [<c011c9cf>]
> preempt_enable_no_resched+0x5f/0x70 (20)
> Dec 23 10:16:27 porky kernel: [<c0100ff2>] cpu_idle+0xb2/0x100 (40)
> Dec 23 10:16:27 porky kernel: [<c0111446>]
> start_secondary+0x296/0x340<6>Freeing initrd memory: 452k freed
>
Yeah, I've seen the "might have lost a preemption check" too. But since
this didn't seem to cause a problem booting my kernel (yet), it went to
the end of the todo list.
Does this cause any other problems?
-- Steve
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
