On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 05:42:28PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 11:16:28AM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > > io.h is a very generic sounding name for something that just houses
> > > a memcpy variant. What's wrong with calling a spade a spade,
> > > and using memcpy32.h ?
> >
> > I think it belongs in string.h alongside memcpy, just for tradition's
> > sake. I don't think it belongs in a file named io.h, as it probably
> > has uses beyond I/O.
>
> Actually I think memcpy32 is not the thing pathscale wants. They want
> memcpy_{to,from}_io32, because memcpy32 wouldn't be allowed to operate
> on I/O mapped memory. I'd say back to the drawingboard.
Ahh, excellent point. We probably want something closer to
iowrite32_rep and have it live in iomap.h. Perhaps iowrite32_copy?
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
