Re: [PATCH] ia64: disable preemption in udelay()

On Fri, 23 Dec 2005, Keith Owens wrote:

> Agreed.  See [RFC] Add thread_info flag for "no cpu migration"[1] on
> lkml.  It got no response.
> 
> [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=113471059115107&w=2

I read it and it would make fixing cpuhotplug + cpufreq also easier. 
However you could also argue that the whole locking in cpufreq should be 
fixed instead.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH] ia64: disable preemption in udelay()
    • From: Keith Owens <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?)
• Next by Date: Re: flow chart tool?
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] ia64: disable preemption in udelay()
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] ia64: disable preemption in udelay()
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]