Re: [PATCH 0/3] msi abstractions and support for altix

On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 02:26:27PM -0600, Mark Maule wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:22:59PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 02:15:44PM -0600, Mark Maule wrote:
> > > Resend #2: including linuxppc64-dev and linux-pci as well as PCI maintainer
> > 
> > I'll wait for Resend #3 based on my previous comments before considering
> > adding it to my kernel trees:)
> > 
> 
> Resend #2 includes the correction to the irq_vector[] declaration, and I
> responded to the question about setting irq_vector[0] if that's what you
> mean ...

Sorry, but I missed that last response.  Why do you set the [0] value in
a #ifdef now?

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 0/3] msi abstractions and support for altix
    • From: Mark Maule <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/3] msi abstractions and support for altix
    • From: Mark Maule <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/3] msi abstractions and support for altix
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/3] msi abstractions and support for altix
    • From: Mark Maule <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/3] msi abstractions and support for altix
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/3] msi abstractions and support for altix
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/3] msi abstractions and support for altix
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]