Re: [patch 0/8] mutex subsystem, ANNOUNCE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:

> It would be nice to first do a run with a fair implementation of 
> mutexes.

which fairness implementation do you mean - the one where all tasks will 
get the lock in fair FIFO order, and a 'lucky bastard' cannot steal the 
lock from waiters and thus put them at an indefinite disadvantage?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux