Re: [POLL] SLAB : Are the 32 and 192 bytes caches really usefull on x86_64 machines ?

On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 03:09:02PM +0100, Folkert van Heusden wrote:

 > > Your results are interesting : size-32 seems to use objects of size 64 !
 > > > size-32             1538   2714     64 <<HERE>>
 > > So I guess that size-32 cache could be avoided at least for EMT (I take you 
 > > run a 64 bits kernel ?)
 > 
 > I think I do yes:
 > Linux xxxxx 2.4.21-37.EL #1 SMP Wed Sep 7 13:32:18 EDT 2005 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
 > It is a redhat 4 x64 system.

Looks more like RHEL3 judging from the kernel version.

		Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [POLL] SLAB : Are the 32 and 192 bytes caches really usefull on x86_64 machines ?
    • From: Folkert van Heusden <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.0.0
    • From: Junio C Hamano <[email protected]>
  • [POLL] SLAB : Are the 32 and 192 bytes caches really usefull on x86_64 machines ?
    • From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
  • Re: [POLL] SLAB : Are the 32 and 192 bytes caches really usefull on x86_64 machines ?
    • From: Ed Tomlinson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [POLL] SLAB : Are the 32 and 192 bytes caches really usefull on x86_64 machines ?
    • From: Folkert van Heusden <[email protected]>
  • Re: [POLL] SLAB : Are the 32 and 192 bytes caches really usefull on x86_64 machines ?
    • From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
  • Re: [POLL] SLAB : Are the 32 and 192 bytes caches really usefull on x86_64 machines ?
    • From: Folkert van Heusden <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 1/8] mutex subsystem, XFS namespace collision fixes
• Next by Date: Re: vfat question
• Previous by thread: Re: [POLL] SLAB : Are the 32 and 192 bytes caches really usefull on x86_64 machines ?
• Next by thread: Re: [POLL] SLAB : Are the 32 and 192 bytes caches really usefull on x86_64 machines ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]