Re: [BUG linux-2.6.15-rc] process events connector - soft lockup detected

Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>  Gad, how ddd that get in there?

That's how to pronounce "did" with a headcold.

I note that copy_process() also calls cpuset_fork() under
write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock) which is a) inefficient and b) forbidden
according to the nice comment over task_lock().
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [BUG linux-2.6.15-rc] process events connector - soft lockup detected
  - From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>

References:
- [BUG linux-2.6.15-rc] process events connector - soft lockup detected
  - From: Guillaume Thouvenin <[email protected]>
- Re: [BUG linux-2.6.15-rc] process events connector - soft lockup detected
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [RFC PATCH] was Re: [RFC] Documentation dir is a mess
Next by Date: Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
Previous by thread: Re: [BUG linux-2.6.15-rc] process events connector - soft lockup detected
Next by thread: Re: [BUG linux-2.6.15-rc] process events connector - soft lockup detected
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]