Hi Alex,
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, Alexander Clouter wrote:
Morning Ken,
Ken Moffat <[email protected]> [20051122 01:21:18 +0000]:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Alexander Clouter wrote:
Con complained about that one too, rightly so. If you look more recently you
will see that the default is actually now '0' so nice'd processes do count
towards the business calculation....I guess I could submit *another* more or
less duplicate patch to really confuse things to rename the sysfs entry again
and it to expect a huge prime number to ignore nice'd processes ;)
Guess you can go back to your initscript and remove that entry :P
Cheers
Alex
If the default is that nice'd processes do count, then I'm happy (and
I've yet again showed my lack of understanding). Thanks.
Ken
--
das eine Mal als Trag�die, das andere Mal als Farce
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
