Re: [PATCH 01/15] mm: poison struct page for ptlock

On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> It occurs to me that we can do the above if (__GNUC__ > 2), or whatever.
> 
> That way, the only people who have a 4-byte-larger pageframe are those who
> use CONFIG_PREEMPT, NR_CPUS>=4 and gcc-2.x.y.  An acceptably small
> community, I suspect.

I can't really think of this at the moment (though the PageReserved
fixups going smoother this evening).  Acceptably small community, yes.
But wouldn't it plunge us into the very mess of wrappers we were trying
to avoid with anony structunions, to handle the __GNUC__ differences?

Hugh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 01/15] mm: poison struct page for ptlock
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 00/15] mm: struct page lock and counts
    • From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 01/15] mm: poison struct page for ptlock
    • From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 01/15] mm: poison struct page for ptlock
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 01/15] mm: poison struct page for ptlock
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
• Next by Date: [PATCH] add success/failure indication to RCU torture test
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 01/15] mm: poison struct page for ptlock
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 01/15] mm: poison struct page for ptlock
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]