Re: [PATCH 01/05] NUMA: Generic code

On Tuesday 15 November 2005 09:34, Magnus Damm wrote:

> 
> My plan with breaking out the NUMA emulation code was to merge my i386
> stuff with the x86_64 code, but as you say - it might be overkill.
> 
> What do you think about the fact that real NUMA nodes now can be
> divided into several smaller nodes?

Is it really needed? I never needed it.  Normally numa emulation 
is just for basic numa testing, and for that just an independent
split is good enough.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 01/05] NUMA: Generic code
    • From: Magnus Damm <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH 01/05] NUMA: Generic code
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 01/05] NUMA: Generic code
    • From: Magnus Damm <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] HOWTO do Linux kernel development
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/4] add compat_ioctl methods to dasd
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 01/05] NUMA: Generic code
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 01/05] NUMA: Generic code
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]