Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> +static void lru_add_drain_per_cpu(void *dummy)
> +{
> + lru_add_drain();
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Isolate one page from the LRU lists and put it on the
> + * indicated list. Do necessary cache draining if the
> + * page is not on the LRU lists yet.
> + *
> + * Result:
> + * 0 = page not on LRU list
> + * 1 = page removed from LRU list and added to the specified list.
> + * -1 = page is being freed elsewhere.
> + */
> +int isolate_lru_page(struct page *page)
> +{
> + int rc = 0;
> + struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
> +
> +redo:
> + spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> + rc = __isolate_lru_page(zone, page);
> + spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> + if (rc == 0) {
> + /*
> + * Maybe this page is still waiting for a cpu to drain it
> + * from one of the lru lists?
> + */
> + smp_call_function(&lru_add_drain_per_cpu, NULL, 0 , 1);
lru_add_drain() ends up doing spin_unlock_irq(), so we'll enable interrupts
within the smp_call_function() handler. Is that legal on all
architectures?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
