Re: [PATCH 2 of 2] tpm: updates for new hardware

> Why don't you use ioread8() instead of defining atmel_getb()?
> 
> You'd still need something PPC64-specific to initialize the iomem cookie,
> but the accessors would go away.
> 
> Unfortunately, ioread8() and associated interfaces aren't mentioned
> under Documentation/, but there are some hints in lib/iomap.c.

Yes, I was about to reply the same thing :)

Ben.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 2 of 2] tpm: updates for new hardware
    • From: Kylene Jo Hall <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2 of 2] tpm: updates for new hardware
    • From: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.14 X spinning in the kernel
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC] HOWTO do Linux kernel development
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2 of 2] tpm: updates for new hardware
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2 of 2] tpm: updates for new hardware
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]