On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 02:35:51AM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
> trivial: drop unused 802.3 code if we compile without IPX
>
> (originally from http://wohnheim.fh-wedel.de/~joern/software/kernel/je/25/)
>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>
>
> Index: tiny/net/802/Makefile
> ===================================================================
> --- tiny.orig/net/802/Makefile 2005-03-15 00:24:59.000000000 -0600
> +++ tiny/net/802/Makefile 2005-03-15 00:25:48.000000000 -0600
> @@ -2,8 +2,6 @@
> # Makefile for the Linux 802.x protocol layers.
> #
>
> -obj-y := p8023.o
> -
> # Check the p8022 selections against net/core/Makefile.
> obj-$(CONFIG_SYSCTL) += sysctl_net_802.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_LLC) += p8022.o psnap.o
> @@ -11,5 +9,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_TR) += p8022.o psnap.o tr.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_NET_FC) += fc.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_FDDI) += fddi.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_HIPPI) += hippi.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_IPX) += p8022.o psnap.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_IPX) += p8022.o psnap.o p8023.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ATALK) += p8022.o psnap.o
This patch isn't bad, but looking closer we could move the contents of
p8023.c as well as the contents of at least p8022.c and pe2.c into
af_ipx.c.
Is the contents of any of these three files expected to be used
outside IPX (closest candidate would be appletalk)?
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
