On Sul, 2005-11-13 at 11:59 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Dave Jones <[email protected]> writes:
> >
> > Looks like the Ubuntu people already did this...
> >
> > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/bcollins/ubuntu-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=048985336e32efe665cddd348e92e4a4a5351415;hp=1cb630c2b5aaad7cedaa78aa135e6cecf5ab91ac
>
> It's probably not needed. At least AMD K7/K8 has a SYSCFG MSR bit to
> do this (or rather they disable bus cycles for locks that makes them
> very cheap) Intel has one too in a different MSR that looks similar.
> With some luck they're even already set by the BIOS on UP systems. I
> know they are on some AMD systems.
I'd hope the vendors are not doing that by default because we have
kernel code that uses lock against not other processors but other bus
masters. The ECC code is one example. Is there any good info on the AMD
one so I can make the EDAC code put the processor back in x86 compatible
mode so that it behaves safely when scrubbing.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
