Re: [PATCH 2.6.14-rt11 3/3] Fix ppc32 bootwrapper code for new zlib

On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 03:24:28PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Make the ppc32 bootwrapper code mirror what the ppc64 version does to 
> > clean out locking, etc, from lib/zlib_inflate/
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <[email protected]>
> 
> why is this needed in -rt? Shouldnt this go upstream?

This is only needed by the 'add spinlocks/etc to zlib_inflate' changes
that aren't in 2.6.14 stock at least, and I don't think will be in
2.6.15-rc1.

The slightly better solution is I need to talk with Matt Mackall about
his zlib changes and how he thinks p*pc* can be done better, but without
duplicating code again.

-- 
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 2.6.14-rt11 1/3] Fix LPPTEST Kconfig dependancies
    • From: Tom Rini <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 2.6.14-rt11 3/3] Fix ppc32 bootwrapper code for new zlib
    • From: Tom Rini <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2.6.14-rt11 3/3] Fix ppc32 bootwrapper code for new zlib
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] block/elevator.c: forget about strncpy()
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] cpuset - fix return without releasing semaphore
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.14-rt11 3/3] Fix ppc32 bootwrapper code for new zlib
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.14-rt11 1/3] Fix LPPTEST Kconfig dependancies
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]