On Sat, 12 Nov 2005, Claudio Scordino wrote:
> >
> > In which case the only comment I have is the one about accuracy - and
> > that is true for procfs too so will only come up if someone gets the
> > urge to use perfctr timers for precision resource management
>
> According to your comments, this the final patch.
this only lets you get RUSAGE_SELF data for the target... for many
processes it's more important to get the RUSAGE_CHILDREN data... and
really i'm having a hard time imagining a use for this code which on
further inspection doesn't eventually blow up to the requirements of a
proper accounting subsystem... (of which i understand there are two or
three competining implementations in progress?)
do you have a use case for this new code?
-dean
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
