Re: local denial-of-service with file leases

* Trond Myklebust ([email protected]) wrote:
> Bruce has a simpler patch (see attachment). The call to fasync_helper()
> in order to free active structures will have already been done in
> locks_delete_lock(), so in principle, all we want to do is to skip the
> fasync_helper() call in fcntl_setlease().

Yes, that's better, thanks.  Will you make sure it gets to Linus?

thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: local denial-of-service with file leases
    • From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>

• References:
  • local denial-of-service with file leases
    • From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
  • Re: local denial-of-service with file leases
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
  • Re: local denial-of-service with file leases
    • From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 6/9] Cleanup kmem_cache_create()
• Next by Date: Re: [BUG] Ali snd soft lookup on 2.6.14 (regression)
• Previous by thread: Re: local denial-of-service with file leases
• Next by thread: Re: local denial-of-service with file leases
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]