On Friday 11 November 2005 16:50, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> Andi Kleen <[email protected]> 11.11.05 16:34:44 >>>
> >
> >On Wednesday 09 November 2005 17:10, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> IA32 compatibility entry points needlessly played with extended
> >> registers. Additionally, frame unwind information was still
>
> incorrect
>
> >> for ia32_ptregs_common (sorry, my fault).
> >
> >What do you mean with needlessly played? That it didn't initialize
> >all on the stack frame? That was more a feature than a bug.
> >Did it cause you problems?
>
> It saved and restored R12-R15, even though these registers have no
> meaning (and are architecturally undefined) when coming from/going to
> 32-bit mode. Problems? No, except that without the extra loads (stores
> don't matter that much I believe) performance is better...
int 0x80 can be called from long mode too. We especially kept
this option to allow JITs like valgrind to run a 32bit process in a 64bit
image. In this case we shouldn't leak kernel registers.
You're right they normally shouldn't be leaked anyways because the
C ABI will save/restore it. I will think about it.
>
> >In general I'm weary of making the asm macros more complex
> >(adding more arguments etc.) Please keep it simple.
>
> Then ignore this, perhaps with the exception of the unwind info
> adjustment.
Can you please resubmit that as a separate patch?
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
