Hugh Dickins <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > yuck. What is the real problem btw? AFAICS there's enough space for a > > 2-word spinlock in struct page for pagetables. > > Yes. There is no real problem. But my patch offends good taste. > Isn't it going to overrun page.lru with CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 01/15] mm: poison struct page for ptlock
- From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 01/15] mm: poison struct page for ptlock
- References:
- [PATCH 00/15] mm: struct page lock and counts
- From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 01/15] mm: poison struct page for ptlock
- From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 01/15] mm: poison struct page for ptlock
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 01/15] mm: poison struct page for ptlock
- From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 01/15] mm: poison struct page for ptlock
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 01/15] mm: poison struct page for ptlock
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 01/15] mm: poison struct page for ptlock
- From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 00/15] mm: struct page lock and counts
- Prev by Date: Re: Nick's core remove PageReserved broke vmware...
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] handling 64bit values for st_ino]
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 01/15] mm: poison struct page for ptlock
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 01/15] mm: poison struct page for ptlock
- Index(es):
 |