Re: [PATCH 1/39] NLKD - an alternative kallsyms approach

On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 08:50:15AM -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> BTW, are you posting these just for comments or did you want
> someone to apply/merge them?  If so, who?  You should send them
> to that someone (unless you have some other arrangements) --
> at least that's the normal procedure.

And the documented one too, see Documentation/SubmittingPatches, section
5.

Why does no one ever read the documentation...

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/39] NLKD - Novell Linux Kernel Debugger
    • From: "Jan Beulich" <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 1/39] NLKD - an alternative kallsyms approach
    • From: "Jan Beulich" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/39] NLKD - an alternative kallsyms approach
    • From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Stopping Kernel Threads at module unload time
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 19/21] i386 Kprobes semaphore fix
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/39] NLKD - an alternative kallsyms approach
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/39] NLKD - an alternative kallsyms approach
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]