On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 15:58 +0000, Al Viro wrote: > On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 04:49:17PM +0100, Ian Kumlien wrote: > > > > People is allowed to have different opinions than you, deal with it. > > > > And that applies to me to, now deal with it. > > That's easy - you are welcome to maintain whatever tree you like according > to your opinion. Same as everybody else. ROTFLOL, Yeah i know, I just think it's more about the users need than 'stable' and 'unstable', Just label it experimental so the user knows what they are getting into. (Just like the examples posted in other mails) -- Ian Kumlien <pomac () vapor ! com> -- http://pomac.netswarm.net
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- References:
- Re: New Linux Development Model
- From: Ian Kumlien <[email protected]>
- Re: New Linux Development Model
- From: Marcos Marado <[email protected]>
- Re: New Linux Development Model
- From: Ian Kumlien <[email protected]>
- Re: New Linux Development Model
- From: "Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:03:07 +0100" <[email protected]>
- Re: New Linux Development Model
- From: Ian Kumlien <[email protected]>
- Re: New Linux Development Model
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: New Linux Development Model
- Prev by Date: Re: typedefs and structs
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 12/18] shared mount handling: bind and rbind
- Previous by thread: Re: New Linux Development Model
- Next by thread: Re: New Linux Development Model
- Index(es):
 |