Re: [PATCH 12/18] shared mount handling: bind and rbind

On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 11:54:36AM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> Shouldn't this check go before copy_tree()?  Not much point in copying
> the tree if we are sure it won't be used.

Incorrect.  Propagation nodes further down the tree can very well be
mountable.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 12/18] shared mount handling: bind and rbind
    • From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 12/18] shared mount handling: bind and rbind
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 12/18] shared mount handling: bind and rbind
    • From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH 39/39] NLKD/x86-64 - Remote Debug Agent
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 13/18] shared mounts handling: move
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 12/18] shared mount handling: bind and rbind
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 12/18] shared mount handling: bind and rbind
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]