Re: [PATCH] minor ELF addition

"Jan Beulich" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> A trivial addition to the ELF definitions.
> 
> ...
>  #define STT_FILE    4
> +#define STT_COMMON  5
> +#define STT_TLS     6

Is there any particular reason for adding these, or is it just a
completeness thing?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] minor ELF addition
    • From: "Jan Beulich" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] minor ELF addition
    • From: "Jan Beulich" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Compatible fstat()
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] i386: don't blindly enable interrupts in die()
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] minor ELF addition
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] minor ELF addition
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]