On 2005-10-01, at 00:01, Luben Tuikov wrote:
Why should synchronization between Process A and Process B reading storage attributes take place in the kernel? They can synchronize in user space.
In a mandatory and transparent way? How? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- RE: I request inclusion of SAS Transport Layer and AIC-94xx into the kernel
- From: "Salyzyn, Mark" <[email protected]>
- RE: I request inclusion of SAS Transport Layer and AIC-94xx into the kernel
- From: Andrew Patterson <[email protected]>
- Re: I request inclusion of SAS Transport Layer and AIC-94xx into the kernel
- From: Luben Tuikov <[email protected]>
- Re: I request inclusion of SAS Transport Layer and AIC-94xx into the kernel
- From: Andrew Patterson <[email protected]>
- Re: I request inclusion of SAS Transport Layer and AIC-94xx into the kernel
- From: Luben Tuikov <[email protected]>
- Re: I request inclusion of SAS Transport Layer and AIC-94xx into the kernel
- From: Andrew Patterson <[email protected]>
- Re: I request inclusion of SAS Transport Layer and AIC-94xx into the kernel
- From: Luben Tuikov <[email protected]>
- RE: I request inclusion of SAS Transport Layer and AIC-94xx into the kernel
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] usb/core/hcd-pci.c: don't free_irq() on suspend
- Next by Date: Re: I request inclusion of SAS Transport Layer and AIC-94xx into the kernel
- Previous by thread: Re: I request inclusion of SAS Transport Layer and AIC-94xx into the kernel
- Next by thread: Re: I request inclusion of SAS Transport Layer and AIC-94xx into the kernel
- Index(es):
