On 09/30/05 17:31, Kyle Moffett wrote:
> Jeff Garzik et. al. seem to think that they are necessary, and I
I've been contending this since before Jeff started work on
libata. But none of the ideas: 64 bit LUN, HCIL removal, etc.,
were accepted with "submit a patch".
> So you're saying fixing the current SCSI subsystem once *now* costs
> more than applying all *future* SCSI fixes to _two_ SCSI subsystems,
> handling bug reports for _two_ SCSI subsystems, etc.
I'm saying that the current "old" one is already obsolete,
when all you have is a SAS chip on your mainboard.
All you need is a small, tiny, fast, slim SCSI Core.
>>>s/Politics.*//g; I hate politics. Keep it off this list.
>>
>>Me too, but we are idealists. Politics is an integral part of life.
>
>
> Politics are not an integral part of productive technical
> discussions, though. If you discuss technical topics and provide
> realistic technical descriptions, examples, reasons, code, etc, then
> politics tends not to matter in the discussion, and we're all happier
> people.
Yes, please re-read this thread, and open and read all the
references I've included to SAM, SPC, SAS and SAT of T10.org.
Politics: "Nah, whatever you say, specs are *crap* and we'll
do it our way. We are not interested in your way, even if it
were better. Oh, and BTW, REQUEST SENSE clears ACA and LUN
is a u64."
See?
Luben
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |