On 9/30/05, Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote: > > ----------- [cut here ] --------- [please bite here ] --------- > > Kernel BUG at net/core/dev.c:1099 > > invalid operand: 0000 [1] PREEMPT > > yep, there's something wrong with the skb which starfire fed into > skb_checksum_help(). > <snip> > > And that's a post-2.6.12 driver change. You can probably work around > it by deleting the #define ZEROCOPY line. :) Anycase, here is a non-PREEMPT traceback. What makes this one interesting, is that in the preempt case, I had to push the NFS output to get the panic, but the non-preempt case attached, sorta just happened, ie. when the clients just checked on the server's status :( -- Hendrik Visage
Attachment:
non-prempt
Description: Binary data
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Starfire (Adaptec) kernel 2.6.13+ panics on AMD64 NFS server
- From: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
- Re: Starfire (Adaptec) kernel 2.6.13+ panics on AMD64 NFS server
- From: Ion Badulescu <[email protected]>
- Re: Starfire (Adaptec) kernel 2.6.13+ panics on AMD64 NFS server
- References:
- Starfire (Adaptec) kernel 2.6.13+ panics on AMD64 NFS server
- From: Hendrik Visage <[email protected]>
- Re: Starfire (Adaptec) kernel 2.6.13+ panics on AMD64 NFS server
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: Starfire (Adaptec) kernel 2.6.13+ panics on AMD64 NFS server
- From: Hendrik Visage <[email protected]>
- Re: Starfire (Adaptec) kernel 2.6.13+ panics on AMD64 NFS server
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Starfire (Adaptec) kernel 2.6.13+ panics on AMD64 NFS server
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.14-rc1-git-now still dying in mm/slab - this time line 1849
- Next by Date: Re: I request inclusion of SAS Transport Layer and AIC-94xx into the kernel
- Previous by thread: Re: Starfire (Adaptec) kernel 2.6.13+ panics on AMD64 NFS server
- Next by thread: Re: Starfire (Adaptec) kernel 2.6.13+ panics on AMD64 NFS server
- Index(es):
