Re: [PATCH] earlier allocation of order 0 pages from pcp in __alloc_pages

On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 15:50 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:


> 
> That looks to share a decent amount of logic with the pcp code in
> buffered_rmqueue.  Any chance it could be consolidated instead of
> copy/pasting?
> 

It indeed does share most of the code with buffered_rmqueue.  And it is
definitely possible to streamline this control flow.  But that would
require more changes in the existing code (didn't want to make that as
part of this patch to start with).

-rohit

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] earlier allocation of order 0 pages from pcp in __alloc_pages
    • From: "Seth, Rohit" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] earlier allocation of order 0 pages from pcp in __alloc_pages
    • From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH] SPI subsystem
• Next by Date: [RFC][PATCH] Generic Timekeeping Rework (cumulative - bz'ed) (v. B6)
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] earlier allocation of order 0 pages from pcp in __alloc_pages
• Next by thread: Re: Problems with CF bluetooth (fwd) (fwd)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]