Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:
Unfortunately I must confirm that it does not fix problem. But it pointed
out to me another thing - proc_inode_cache stuff is put into caches
BEFORE this code is executed. So if anything in mm/slab.c relies
on node_to_mask[] being valid (and if it relies on some other things
which are set this late), it probably won't work.
Petr
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 03:58:16PM +0200, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
Index: linux-2.6.14-rc1/arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.14-rc1.orig/arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c 2005-09-19 17:58:10.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.14-rc1/arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c 2005-09-27 01:34:20.000000000 -0700
@@ -178,7 +178,6 @@
rr++;
}
- set_bit(0, &node_to_cpumask[cpu_to_node(0)]);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_EMU
@@ -266,9 +265,7 @@
__cpuinit void numa_add_cpu(int cpu)
{
- /* BP is initialized elsewhere */
- if (cpu)
- set_bit(cpu, &node_to_cpumask[cpu_to_node(cpu)]);
+ set_bit(cpu, &node_to_cpumask[cpu_to_node(cpu)]);
}
unsigned long __init numa_free_all_bootmem(void)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |