On 09/28/05 18:17, Moore, Eric Dean wrote:
> Can you stop this tirade, e.g. conspiracy theory,
> in regards to LSI/MPT and the transport layer?
What conspiracy theory?
Oh you mean that one _technology_ is in the kernel
and another distinct, radically _different_ is NOT?
Oh you mean that conspiracy theory?
> That is not the case. There will be other sas
I don't see our driver in the kernel, do you?
> solutions that implement discovery, and
> sas/sata translation in firmware, higher level
> event handling.
Yes, and they would all be MPT-like technology.
I don't have a problem with that.
What I have a problem with is that you folks
just sit and watch this, while you could explain
to James et al, that indeed the technologies
are different and there is no reason NOT to include
one but leave the other out.
>>See, I've mentioned many times that the two
>>radically different technologies can coexist.
>>But I've not heard any technical word
>>from the other guys: you.
>
> I just don't have time to engage you.
> I've got work to do, customer requests, issues,
> etc.
:-) That a nice way to get out of the situation.
I was hoping you'd say something like, "Yeah, the
technologies are different -- I don't see why one
should be in and another not."
Luben
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |