Re: [PATCH] RT: epca_lock to DEFINE_SPINLOCK

    Arjan> this is really ugly though; at minimum a DEFINE_STATIC_SPINLOCK()
    Arjan>  would be needed to make this less ugly.

huh?  This is a totally standard kernel idiom -- just do

    grep -Er 'static (DECLARE|DEFINE)' .

in a kernel tree to see how prevalent it is.

 - R.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] RT: epca_lock to DEFINE_SPINLOCK
    • From: Nikita Danilov <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] RT: epca_lock to DEFINE_SPINLOCK
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] RT: epca_lock to DEFINE_SPINLOCK
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Infinite interrupt loop, INTSTAT = 0
• Next by Date: C/H/S support merged
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] RT: epca_lock to DEFINE_SPINLOCK
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] RT: epca_lock to DEFINE_SPINLOCK
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]