Re: [ANNOUNCE] Framework for automatic Configuration of a Kernel

Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This is great, I didn't know this DMI table.
> 
> Is there some overlap with the lspci detection ?
> And if yes, which one has to be taken into account ?

Ok, I read the documentation, this question was stupid... sorry. :)

Regards
-- 
Emmanuel Fleury

Providence protects children and idiots.
I know because I have tested it.
  -- Mark Twain
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Framework for automatic Configuration of a Kernel
    • From: Ahmad Reza Cheraghi <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Framework for automatic Configuration of a Kernel
    • From: Emmanuel Fleury <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Framework for automatic Configuration of a Kernel
    • From: Andreas Jellinghaus <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Framework for automatic Configuration of a Kernel
    • From: Emmanuel Fleury <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: raw aio write guarantee
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.14-rc2-rt2
• Previous by thread: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Framework for automatic Configuration of a Kernel
• Next by thread: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Framework for automatic Configuration of a Kernel
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]