Re: [ANNOUNCE] ktimers subsystem

Hi,

On Sun, 25 Sep 2005, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> > You know very well, that the conversion back to timespec is the killer in 
> > your calculation. You graciously decide that the "vast majority" doesn't 
> > want to read the timer, how did you get to that conclusion?
> 
> I graciously put instrumentation into _all_ the relevant syscalls on a
> desktop and a server machine. The result is that less than 1% of the
> calls provide the read back variable.

That sill means it is used and if an application actually depends on it, 
it would be penalized by your implementation.
These timers may open up new application (in kernel or user space), where 
this conversion may be needed, so _only_ looking at the current numbers is 
a bit misleading.

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] ktimers subsystem
    • From: Tim Bird <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [ANNOUNCE] ktimers subsystem
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] ktimers subsystem
    • From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] ktimers subsystem
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] ktimers subsystem
    • From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] ktimers subsystem
    • From: "Christopher Friesen" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] ktimers subsystem
    • From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] ktimers subsystem
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] ktimers subsystem
    • From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] ktimers subsystem
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] ktimers subsystem
    • From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] ktimers subsystem
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] ktimers subsystem
    • From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] ktimers subsystem
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [Security] [vendor-sec] [BUG/PATCH/RFC] Oops while completing async USB via usbdevio
• Next by Date: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [Security] [vendor-sec] [BUG/PATCH/RFC] Oops while completing async USB via usbdevio
• Previous by thread: Re: [ANNOUNCE] ktimers subsystem
• Next by thread: Re: [ANNOUNCE] ktimers subsystem
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]