On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 04:15:27PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hello!
> >
> > The attached patch passes 20 hours of the internal-to-RCU torture test
> > (see the code in the attached patch under CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST),
> > which is a good improvement over last week's version, which would fail
> > this test in less than two seconds -- this despite passing kernbench
> > with flying colors and passing LTP 90% of the time. Sometimes there
> > is no substitute for a good in-kernel stress test...
> >
> > The attached version of the patch seems to me to be ready for a larger
> > audience.
>
> Cool! I've merged your patch to the -52-12 version of the -RT patch. You
> can get it from the usual place:
>
> http://redhat.com/~mingo/realtime-preempt/
>
> also, i've attached a port against 2.6.13-rc4. I have done this because
> the PREEMPT_RCU patch in my tree is applied before the core-PREEMPT_RT
> patch. I have fixed up the CONFIG_PREEMPT compilation branch and have
> removed your #error define - it built and booted fine on an UP box but
> there are no guarantees ...
Sounds great!!! I will give it a thorough hammering in both the
CONFIG_PREEMPT and CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT environments.
Thanx, Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |