Hi Marcelo,
you type faster than me :-)
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 01:50:53PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> And what about the side effects:
> This however will produce pathological cases, like having a idle system
> being requested 1 ms timeouts will give systematically 2 ms timeouts,
> whereas currently it simply gives a few usecs less than 1 ms.
Unless I'm mistaken, it's worse. 1 ms will lead to 11 ms because
HZ is still 100 on most common archs in 2.4. Perhaps we could find
a way to round it_real_incr up instead of systematically adding 1
to interval ?
Cheers,
Willy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
